The Buzz Forum Buzz

Kendall Jenner Doesn’t Cut It as Harper’s Bazaar’s February Cover Girl

American Harper’s Bazaar has become a little predictable over the years (and they aren’t alone), churning out covers with the same old faces issue after issue. As the magazine unveils its first standalone edition of 2018, Kendall Jenner is back on the cover exactly seven issues after she resembled a 60s housewife on Bazaar‘s May 2016 installment. Appearing more modern this time, Kendall was photographed by Solve Sundsbo, wearing Calvin Klein and Saint Laurent on the special subscribers cover (after the jump).

US Harper's Bazaar February 2018 : Kendall Jenner by Solve Sundsbo

IMAGE: COURTESY OF HARPER’S BAZAAR

Per usual, a select few of our forum members weren’t here for anything Kendall related. “She’s just a pretty girl who sits there. Essentially. There’s never anything to anything. The cover just looks like it belongs in Estée Lauder’s Christmas campaign to me,” voiced honeycombchild.

“I mean, she really is hopeless as a model. At this stage I am just laughing,” ranted KissMiss.

“Yawn. She just isn’t a model to me. All I ever see is a pretty actress in high fashion clothes,” stated liv4beauty.

TREVOFASHIONISTO wasn’t exactly jumping for joy either. “She is incredibly boring, I just don’t get it,” he said.

Also quick to voice their dismay was forum member Miss Dalloway. “My god, how can it be 2018, and we still have no word of [Glenda] Bailey leaving?” she asked.

“Actually, not bad at all,” confessed a pleasantly surprised TeeVanity, in an attempt to change the mood of the thread.

“A red and white color scheme on a cover seems to suit her,” noticed tigerrouge.

“That subscriber’s cover (below) is undoubtedly going to draw a lot of Vogue Paris comparisons,” said dodencebt, in reference to Kaia Gerber‘s current cover.

US Harper's Bazaar February 2018 : Kendall Jenner by Solve Sundsbo

IMAGE: HARPERSBAZAAR.COM

See Kendall’s cover shoot in full, check out another limited cover for the issue and join the conversation here.